Online Publication

 

CPD Occasional Paper Series 3

Setting the Agenda for the Next WTO Round: Perspectives from Bangladesh on the Seattle Ministerial


In the face of their continued marginalisation in the global trade and investment many developing countries are trying to pursue a proactive approach in their effort to more effectively integrate their economies in the Multilateral trading system (MTS). At the same time, developed countries have stepped up their efforts towards an early launching of a new round of Multilateral trading negotiations (MTN) and broadening its scope through
the inclusion of "new" issues. With the approach of the Third Ministerial Conference of the WTO, the developing countries (DCs) in general and the least developed countries (LDCs) in particular found it necessary to take the stock of the state of implementation of the UR agreements, to assess the prospect of reviewing the so-called "built-in agenda" of the UR agreements and to prepare for the next MTN. This was essential especially in view of the call by some of the developed countries to hold a new round of trade talks at the earliest possible time. This paper seeks to project a civil society perspective on Bangladesh's concerns and expectations in the wake of the third WTO Ministerial Meeting.

The paper points out that WTO provisions allow for reviews of particular provisions of certain agreements as well as the whole agreements at a certain specified period according to agreed schedules. A clear understanding on the problems of implementation, and new directions of negotiations pertaining to various provisions of the built-in agenda are of vital importance for a country such as Bangladesh. Major reviews which were expected to come under discussion in the Seattle meeting embraced three areas: (a) specific provision review, (b) general review and (c) continuing negotiations. Since the Seattle Meeting was expected to provide an opportunity to discuss important components of the major agreements negotiated under the Uruguay Round and set the agenda for some of the future negotiations, it was hoped that the Meeting would provide broad guidelines along which such reviews could be undertaken. It was thus important for Bangladesh to design a thoughtful strategic response on each of the important issues involved in the built-in agenda which would come under discussion in the course of the Seattle Meeting and, in the process, to be able to influence the discussion in such a way that the position of the LDCs could be adequately reflected in the Ministerial Text which was expected to be adopted at the meeting. Keeping this in the perspective, the paper comes out with a number of concrete recommendations towards strengthening integration of the LDCs into the global trading regime. These cover such areas as ATC, anti-dumping, TRIPS, TRIMS and dispute settlement mechanism
s.

It is pointed out that a number of member countries have already submitted a good number of proposals for new negotiations concerning agriculture, services and related issues. These include: negotiations in some specified sectors of services, negotiations on specific subjects, negotiations for further liberalisation of trade in all service sectors, and quota-free access to all agricultural products etc. The paper attempts to articulate what could be Bangladesh's position vis-à-vis those proposal.

The paper also points out that the UR Agreement came out with a specific positive agenda for the developing countries, specially the LDCs. The positive agenda was expected to contribute towards reversal of the process of continued marginalisation of the LDCs in the global economy.

The paper calls for ascertaining the extent to which the promised package of support has actually been realised on the ground in the post-URA through a comprehensive review and that this should precede any new round of trade negotiation.

The paper argues that by following a strategy of positive engagement around a pro-active agenda, Bangladesh could maximise from the opportunities available within the WTO regime. The paper identifies a number of common issues and approaches which could inform the position to be taken by the LDCs as a group during the Seattle Ministerial.

To obtain the full text of this report please contact:

Centre for Policy Dialogue
Dialogue and Communication Division
House 40C, Road 11, Dhanmondi R/A, Dhaka-1205, Bangladesh
Mailing Address: GPO Box 2129, Dhaka-1000,Bangladesh
Tel: (8802) 8124770, Fax: (8802) 813095.