Recent Activities home page
Press Briefing on the National
Budget 2006-07
June 9, 2006
The proposed budget for fiscal
2006-07 is a 'swan song' of the
finance minister -- long on
claims, short on delivery and
lacking vision -- instead of
having a comprehensive
assessment of economic
performance of the government
nearing the end of its tenure,
the Centre for Policy Dialogue
(CPD) has observed.
"There is no courageous or
creative fiscal and
institutional initiative in the
proposed budget for the next
financial year (FY) but it has
symbolic allocation in disparate
areas. It is a budget for
everybody, but for nobody," said
Dr Debapriya Bhattacharya,
executive director of the CPD,
while giving an analysis of the
budget at a press briefing at
Cirdap auditorium in the capital
yesterday.
The renowned economist noted,
"There is an impossible spending
target underwritten by an
improbable financing scheme.
Computability of monetary and
fiscal policy is questionable."
For all practical purposes, one
may expect a slowdown in the
economy during FY07, Debapriya
said. The assumed inflation rate
for the year is six per cent.
Given the improbable projection
for foreign financing, it is
quite obvious that the
government will have to lean
heavily on domestic bank
borrowing.
Reduction of tariffs on certain
food items will have a marginal
effect on the market, as global
price of rice continues to rise,
he said. With the added pressure
from fuel price hike, there will
possibly be no respite on the
inflation front.
It appears that the budget
preparation process took the
public expenditure outlay as the
point of departure and then made
acquisition revenue projections
with the shortfall covered by
foreign financing and domestic
borrowing, the CPD analysis
said.
Moreover, it is evident that the
poverty reduction strategy (PRS)
in the very first year of its
implementation got scuttled and
that the finance minister has
made no effort to assess the
outcomes of FY06 based on the
policy matrix contained in the
PRS document.
"The growth rate will take the
hit as indicated by the recent
trend in credit flow to private
sector, import performance,
growth in letter of credit (L/C)
opening etc," mentioned
Debapriya. "The issue is to
pre-empt any serious
destabilisation in terms of
inflation rate, import rate and
exchange rate in the coming
months."
There has been no attempt to
explain how the incremental
growth has benefited the poor.
"Our assessment indicates that
the pro-poor dimension element
of the growth had been rather
weak, particularly in case of
wage employment," he went on.
Other than some initiatives in
the tax administration, the
budget neither recognises the
poor state of policy management
in the government. The budget,
having mentioned in three places
the adverse consequences of
corruption, does not even
mention the Anti-Corruption
Commission or any other
initiatives to check wastage,
leakage and outright theft of
public resources, the CPD
analysis said.
"It is highly unlikely that the
sound will be able to speed much
in the next three months."
The proposed fiscal measures in
general indicate an attempt to
liberalise the trade regime
further and to make inputs
available at globally acceptable
price, Debapriya said. "Some
discrete attempts to provide
protection to emerging domestic
industries are also visible.
However, current tariff
structure continues to protect
specific interest group as it is
in the case of newsprint."
Notwithstanding reference to a
conceptual framework at the
beginning of the budget speech
of the finance minister, the
macroeconomic framework has not
been applied to explain the
future fiscal and monetary
stance of the government in
achieving the growth target,
fiscal and external balance and
assumed inflation rate, the CPD
analysis said.
Indeed, the next caretaker
government is expected to take
measures to settle the economy
at a low equilibrium till the
new political government
prepares its economic policies
and programmes to bring the PRS
in line, it said.
According to the new target of
revenue earnings, the government
will have to collect 17.1 per
cent more revenue in FY07 and
the National Board of Revenue (NBR)
will have to record a 19.15
percent growth, Debapriya said.
"Given the past record of
revenue collection, this is just
an unachievable target."
Bangladesh economy posted 6.71
percent GDP growth in FY06 and
this preliminary estimate was
made on the basis of six to
seven months' data, when the
economy was going through a
momentum of high credit
expansion, export, import,
industrial production and high
inflation, he observed.
The CPD executive director
pointed out that to ease the
pressure on fiscal and external
balance, the government took a
number of measures such as
increasing the lending rate,
controlling import and
subsequently the economy was
slowed down during the last
quarter of FY06 and the initial
growth estimate may be revised
downward when data for the full
FY becomes available.
He said it is becoming a
practice that an outgoing
government shows the highest GDP
performance in its last year but
with the change of government
such estimates are revised
downward.
"FY07 may very well be over.
Thus, one should be prepared to
see phased downtrend revision of
the proposed budget as the
regime changes," he observed.
The analysis said the slack left
behind by public investment was
however somewhat picked up by
private investment and
'Bangladesh continues to remain
an under-invested country'.
Although the proposed budget
made the highest allocation in
education sector, it miserably
failed to design proper
institutional mechanism to
ensure quality education, the
analysis mentioned.
Block allocation in the proposed
budget has been Tk 6,100 crore,
which is around nine per cent of
the budget size, Debapriya said,
questioning the motive behind
this.
It is an allocation for which
there is no accountability and
it is against the spirit of
financial discipline, he said,
adding a major portion of this
amount will be spent on road
construction and repairing. "It
will be very difficult to
pinpoint the logic if there is
any allegation."